A preliminary report on the determination of the vertical
dimension of occlusion using the principle of the mandibular
position in swallowing
N. K. Mohindra, BDS
When constructing replacement complete dentures, trying to
estimate the correct occlusion vertical dimension (OVD) can be
difficult. This paper describes a method of using the
swallowing method to estimate the correct OVD and to form
occlusal pivots on old dentures prior to constructing new
ones. The method has been used on 21 patients. The mean
increase in the OVD was 9.7 mm with the largest increase being
19 mm and the smallest 3 mm. All the increases in OVD were
done in one step, there were no gradual build-ups. New
dentures were constructed to the height of the pivots once the
patients were comfortable with the modified old dentures. In
three cases the OVD had to be reduced once the dentures had
been constructed but in all other cases the patients continued
to wear their new dentures. All 21 patients answered a
questionnaire about their new dentures. All of them were
wearing their new dentures, and 18 out of 21 patients thought
that their new dentures were better than their previous
ones. |
When constructing replacement complete dentures, trying to
achieve the correct occlusion vertical dimension (OVD) can be
difficult, particularly in those instances where there is marked
over-closure. If the vertical dimension is too great the patient
will complain of soreness of the residual ridges, tightness of
facial muscles, and clicking of the dentures during speech. An
increased OVD is also supposed to induce an increased rate of
resorption of the remaining alveolar bone. If the vertical dimension
is too small, the patient will look older, and there may be angular
cheilitis and temporomandibular joint pain.
In the prosthodontic treatment of the edentulous patient, we are
told to use an OVD which is 2-4 mm less than the resting position of
the mandible (RVD). However, the RVD is not static and is influenced
by a number of factors.¹ It has been shown that the RVD tends to
follow the OVD.² As the OVD reduces, due to wear of the artificial
teeth and alveolar resorption, the RVD also reduces. Thus new
dentures constructed at an OVD 3-4 mm less than the measured RVD may
result in an over-closed appearance. If it is proposed to make a
large increase in the OVD, then it is recommended that the changes
should be tested initially by making gradual additions to the
occlusal surfaces of the old dentures.³ In this way the OVD can be
built up by 2-3 mm at a time, until an acceptable height is
achieved. It is argued that this makes it easier for the patient to
adapt to the increase and also allows the dental surgeon to assess
exactly what changes the patient can accept.
It can be difficult to obtain a true record of the RVD and,
because of this, alternative methods have been used to estimate the
OVD for new complete dentures. A screw jack device has been used to
allow patients to select their preferred OVD .4 - 7 This method is
time consuming and the results vary depending upon whether the
estimation commences with the screw jack open or closed.
Biting force has also been used for determining the vertical
dimension.8 However, biting force can be modified by touch pressure
and sub-threshold pain stimuli arising from forceful biting on the
denture bases.9 The use of swallowing is another method that has
been used.10,11 During swallowing the mandible is said to relate to
the maxilla at the 'correct' vertical relation. This paper describes
the use of the swallowing method in establishing the OVD when
constructing replacement complete dentures.
Materials and method Twenty-one people participated in
the study (14 female and 7 male). Their ages ranged from 41 years to
91 years with a mean age of 67.0 years. The dentures being replaced
had been worn for periods ranging from 3 to 45 years, with a mean of
14 years. Fourteen of the patients had worn the same set of dentures
for 10 years or more (Table 1). All the patients attended one
general dental practice between February 1993 and June 1993 and were
treated by the same general dental practitioner. The sequence of
treatment for all patients was similar.
At the first visit a medical and dental history was taken and a
dental examination carried out. The proposed treatment was explained
to the patient, including the fact that their existing dentures
would be modified by adding material to the occlusal surfaces.
At the second visit acrylic resin was added to the lower denture
to convert it to a pivot appliance, which provided occlusal contact
in the first molar region only The additions were made using
light-cured acrylic resin (Triad; Dentsply Ltd). The material was
used according to the manufacturer's instructions, apart from the
fact that the bonding, agent was applied for 1 minute, instead of
the recommended 2 minutes, before curing. This allowed the acrylic
resin pads to be removed easily at a later date, if the additions
were unsuccessful, so restoring the denture to its original
state.
Table I Chart showing age of patients, age of dentures and
increase in vertical dimension of occlusion of new dentures
Patient |
Age (years) |
Age of
old denture (years) |
Increase
in OVD (mm) |
1
|
70
|
9
|
9.5 |
2
|
64
|
3
|
11 |
3
|
74 |
10 |
14 |
4
|
73
|
10
|
7 |
5
|
53
|
9
|
14 |
6
|
50
|
6
|
9 |
7
|
69
|
15
|
7 |
8
|
73
|
6
|
19 |
9
|
91
|
10
|
11 |
10
|
87
|
8
|
10 |
11
|
79
|
10
|
8.5 |
12
|
52
|
10
|
1 |
13
|
82
|
45
|
5 |
14
|
51
|
18
|
8 |
15
|
54
|
10
|
14 |
16
|
41
|
13
|
12 |
17
|
55
|
25
|
13 |
18
|
71 |
15
|
7.5 |
19
|
66
|
30
|
5.5 |
20
|
70
|
10 |
3.5 |
21
|
82
|
3
|
5.5 |
To form the build-up, the lower denture with the uncured acrylic
resin additions was seated in the mouth and the patient asked to
take a sip of water ,and swallow. It is important to achieve a
normal swallowing pattern and this is helped by asking the patient
to wet their lips with the tongue and swallow, keeping the lips
gently together, The acrylic resin pads were then cured. When hard,
the pads were adjusted to remove all indentations of the opposing
teeth so providing flat surfaces for the upper teeth to occlude on.
If the upper teeth were very worn, the mesiopalatal cusps of the
upper first molars were built up so as to obtain point contact
between the upper denture and the acrylic resin pads. If necessary a
tissue conditioner was added to the fitting surface of the
dentures.
At the next visit, the occlusion was checked for any changes that
had occurred in the jaw relationship and adjustments made if
necessary. Treatment did not proceed until the patient was
comfortable and a stable jaw relationship obtained. Once this had
been achieved, new dentures were constructed using a copy technique.
Whilst constructing the new dentures care was taken to ensure that
the OVD was as close as possible to that of the modified dentures.
This involved taking impressions in the trial dentures and to avoid
an increase in the OVD, the pin was adjusted on the articulator by 2
mm prior to setting up the teeth, to allow for the eventual
thickness of the impression material. All measurements of vertical
dimension were made using a pair of dividers with dots on the nose
and chin, with the patient sitting upright and relaxed. Using this
method the following information was recorded:
- The OVD of the old dentures.
- The OVD of the old dentures with the occlusal additions.
- The OVD of the new dentures.
Although at the recall visits the patients all exhibited a
speaking space, the RVD was not measured.
Once treatment was completed and the patients were no longer
attending the surgery, a questionnaire was sent to them to ascertain
their views of the new dentures.
Results In all cases the swallowing method resulted in
the new dentures being constructed with an increase in the occlusal
vertical dimension, compared with the old dentures. The mean
increase was 9.7 mm. The largest increase was 19 mm, whilst the
smallest was 3 mm (fig. 1 and Table I). Subsequent to the fitting of
the dentures, it was necessary to reduce the OVD in three people as
they were unable to tolerate the increase. In two cases the OVD was
reduced by 3 mm and in the other one case by 2 mm. All 21 patients
responded to the questionnaire that was sent to them and all of them
have continued to wear their new dentures. Their answers are
summarised in Table II.
Table II Answers to the questionnaire
|
Yes |
No |
Uncertain |
Do you wear your new
dentures? |
21 |
0 |
0 |
Do you ever go back to
wearing your old dentures? |
0 |
21 |
0 |
Would you say your new
dentures are better than your previous set? |
18 |
2 |
1 |
Do you get a feeling of
discomfort under your new dentures? |
4 |
16 |
1 |
Do the muscles in your
face ache when you are wearing your new dentures? |
2 |
18 |
1 |
Can you speak normally
with your new dentures? |
20 |
1 |
0 |
Can you eat comfortably
with your new dentures? |
18 |
3 |
0 |
Would you say the
appearance of your new dentures is better than your previous
dentures? |
20 |
1 |
0 |
Discussion The use of pivots to modify the occlusal
surfaces of complete dentures is well recognised.12,13 The purpose
of the pivots is to disclude the worn down artificial teeth so
breaking the habituated path of closure. At the same time it allows
for the restoration of the vertical dimension of occlusion. It also
allows the condyles to descend towards their unstrained vertical
position and to assume their unstrained horizontal position. Sears,
12 who did the original work with the pivots, used to position the
pivots in the molar region whilst others13 have placed the pivots in
the lower premolar region as this is supposed to be the centre of
balance. In the technique described in this article, the pivots were
placed in the first molar position with the built up mesiopalatal
cusps occluding, on the lower flat pads.
McNeill14 has postulated that occlusal schemes that encourage
bilateral molar support produce relatively low articular loads in
comparison to the effect of anterior tooth contact. This reduction
in stress assists in the repositioning of the condyles within the
temporomandibular joints. Certainly no patients complained of
instability of their dentures when the pivots were added. Indeed a
number of them commented that their dentures became more stable.
It is often stated in the dental literature that changes in the
OVD should only be done gradually and over a period of time.3,15 Yet
the experience gained in using this technique would seem to indicate
that many people accept and adapt to larger changes. The people
participating in this study were for the most part experienced
denture wearers and were reasonably fit. They could therefore be
considered to be able to accept change. Even allowing for this fact,
if this group of patients is typical of those seen in general dental
practice, then it would seem that the policy of increasing, the OVD
by only 2-3 millimetres at a time is over cautious. It would be
interesting to see the results of treatment in a more frail
population.
In the construction of complete dentures, restoration of a
'correct' vertical dimension has always been one of the aims.
However it is not always easy to decide what the correct vertical
dimension should be. The swallowing method is a functional method of
recording the vertical relation without having to worry about trying
to achieve a record of the resting position of the mandible, a
position which is known to be variable and difficult to achieve.
When a person swallows, the teeth come together with light contact
at the beginning of the swallowing cycle.16 Thus a record of the
relation of the two jaws at this point in the swallowing cycle can
be used as the vertical dimension of occlusion.
In the present study this method has resulted, on occasions, in
large increases. However these are functional increases, 'selected'
by the patients, and overall seem to have been accepted. Further
work needs to be undertaken to ascertain the extent to which the
bulk of the uncured pivots effect the eventual height produced
during swallowing. Would more material produce a greater height or
would the subject close through it? The effect of the viscosity of
the uncured pivots also needs to be investigated. These projects are
difficult to undertake in a busy dental practice but their possible
effects should not be overlooked. One other problem with carrying
out research in general practice is that it is sometimes difficult
to adhere closely to a protocol. General practice is a difficult
area in which to control the variables. The need to satisfy the
customer (the patient) and the need to run the practice in an
economical manner make this difficult.
The use of dots on the nose and chin as markers for measuring the
OVD, although very common, is not very accurate.17 Every effort was
made to ensure that the muscles were not tensed before taking the
readings. This was made very difficult as initially, when the
denture with the hardened pivots was placed in the mouth, the brain
perceived this as a piece of hard food and the facial muscles tensed
up. However, these readings were only ever used to compare and
contrast measurements made at the same visit. Although readings were
used to compare one set of dentures with another readings were never
compared from one visit to the next.
All of the people who replied to the questionnaire stated that
they were wearing, their new dentures. When asked to compare their
new dentures with the ones they replaced, 18 out of 21 said they
were better. This percentage is greater, than that found by Davis
and Watson when this question was put to 68 people who had been
provided with new complete dentures by undergraduates. They found
that only 75%, of the people thought that their new dentures were
better. However, their group was larger and they were comparing
people who had had dentures constructed using a conventional method
with those using, a copy technique. Thus a direct comparison should
only be made with care.
Two of the signs of inadequate freeway space are pain in the
facial musculature and teeth contacting during speech. Eighteen
people replied that they did not have any facial pain whilst 20
people replied that they could speak normally.To the question 'Do
you get a feeling, of discomfort under your dentures' four people
replied that they got a feeling of discomfort under their dentures
and one was uncertain, which could be interpreted as saying yes. The
column 'uncertain' was included as some patients are reluctant to
criticise their dentists work. Hence it was felt that this column
would offer them an alternative to criticising the work
outright.
There are many possible causes for pain beneath dentures, and
undoubtedly too large an increase in the OVD could be a cause .
Discomfort and pain could be the result. If unemployed mucosa is
used when fitting the new dentures. The complaint of discomfort
could not be correlated with the size of the increase in the
OVD.
The author first started using the technique described in this
article in May 1992. This article contains the results of those
patients treated between February 1993 and June 1993. During the
period May 1992 to February 1993 the technique was being developed
with both the author and the dental technician becoming familiar
with the process. During this time the swallowing technique was used
on 10 people.
In this pilot group the OVD was increased by too much in half of
the patients. This was caused by not allowing for the thickness of
the impression materials and by not rehearsing the patients
sufficiently with the swallowing process. The processing of the
dentures can cause an increase in vertical dimension of seclusion,
particularly if the technician has not taken care to keep the flash
to the minimum. Failure to keep the flash to a minimum could have
accounted for some increase in OVD. Also, sufficient time was not
taken to ensure that a stable jaw relationship had been obtained
before constructing the new dentures. Once familiarity with the
technique had been achieved, the results obtained were very
encouraging.
It is important to realise that this is a small study of only 21
people. All of them were judged as needing new dentures constructed
to an increased OVD. More importantly, they were assessed as being
able to accept and adapt to this change. They are, therefore, to
some extent a pre-selected group of individuals, and caution should
be taken in applying these results to all patients requesting new
complete dentures. A more frail, less adaptable group of patients
may not be able to tolerate such large increases. There is clearly a
need for further study into the methods of estimating the correct
OVD and into patients' ability to adapt to the change.
Conclusion The swallowing technique is a functional
method of recording the vertical dimension of occlusion. The method
has been used to form occlusal pivots on old dentures prior to
constructing new ones. The height of the resultant pivots has often
been surprisingly large, but the majority of patients have accepted
and adapted to this increase, and new dentures have been
successfully constructed to this height. This work throws doubt on
the traditional method of estimating the vertical dimension of
occlusion by first measuring the resting face height and then
subtracting 2-4 mm for the freeway space. It also brings into
question the merit of routinely limiting increases in the vertical
dimension of occlusion to 2-3 mm at a time.
Acknowledgements I would like to thank all the patients
who have participated in this trial and also Dr David Davis of
King's College Dental School for his help and advice in the
preparation of this paper.
References
- Basker R M, Davenport J C, Tomlin H R. Prosthetic treatment of
the edentulous patient. 3rd edition. pp 68-73. London: Macmillan
Education, 1992.
- Ismall Y H, George W A, Sassouni V, Scott R H. Cephalometric
study of the changes occurring in the face height following
prosthetic treatment. Part 1: Gradual reduction of both occlusal
and rest face heights.J Prosthet Dent 1968; 19: 321-330.
- Radford D R, Cabot L, B. A problem with dentures. Br Dent Jj
1993; 174: 160.
- Lytle R B. Vertical relation of occlusion by the patient's
neuromuscular perception. J Prosthet Dent 1964; 14:12-21.
- Timmer L H. A reproducible method for determining the vertical
dimension of occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 22: 621-630.
- Van Willigen J D, De Vos A L, Broekhuijsen M L. Psychophysical
investigations of the preferred vertical dimension of occlusion in
edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 35:259-265.
- Tryde G, McMillian D R, Stoltze K et al. Factors influencing
the determination of the occlusal vertical dimension by means of a
screw Jack. J Oral Rehabil 1974; 1: 233-244.
- Boos R. Intermaxillary relation established by biting powcr.
Am Dent Assoc 1940; 27:1192-1199.
- Boucher L J, Zwemer T J, Pflughoeft F. Can biting force be
used as a criterion for registering vertical dimension? J Prosthet
Dent 1959; 9: 594-599.
- Shanahan T E J. Physiological jaw relations and occlusion of
complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1955;5:319-324.
- Laird W R E. Vertical relationships of edentulous jaws during
swallowing. J Dent 1976; 4:5-10.
- Sears V H. Occlusal plvots. J Prosthet Dent 1956; 6: 332-338.
- Watt D M, Lindsay K N. Occlusal pivot appliances. Br Dent J
1972; 132: 110-112.
- McNeill C. Current controversies in temporomandibular
disorders. London: Quintessence, 1992.
- Murray I D. Complete dentures for the elderly. Dent Update
1989; 16:361-397.
- Thexton A J. Mastication and swallowing: an over-view. Br Dent
J 1992; 173:197-206.
- Tryde G, McMillan D R, Christensen J, Brill N. The fallacy of
facial measurements of occlusal height in edentulous subjects. J
Oral Rebabil 1976; 3:353-358.
- Davis D M, Watson R M. A retrospective study comparing
duplication and conventionally made complete dentures for a group
of elderly people. Br Dent J 1993; 175:57-60.
Reproduced with the permission of the British Dental
Journal. |